Lethbridge, vote strategically.

The Lethbridge riding is an interesting one. Straddling a rural-urban divide, it has a history of rewarding government members time and time again. It is not a big fan of change, statistically speaking and tends to play it safe. It also debunks some of the myth that the left vote is always split in cities of this size.

In 2008, NDP and Liberal Party votes amounted to 11 137, while Casson won the riding (again) with 31 714 or 66.95% of the total vote. These results are consistent throughout federal elections since 1997, with a slight anomaly in 2004 when two incredibly popular candidates, Melanee Thomas (NDP) and Ken Nicol (LPC), ran. The vote share for left of center parties was much higher, although Casson still won with 62.62% of the vote.

Since 2000 the second place candidate has always been a left of center party, with the Lethbridge NDP pulling second place in 2006 and 2008. Voting strategically in Lethbridge – to vote against the current government and install a non-CPC member in the house, is a little more difficult than other ridings. It means getting every disenchanted progressive to vote as well. It also means accepting a result beyond partisan values and aligning those values to a generalized progressive platform. Luckily, this election features a Liberal platform with currents of the NDP platform that closely aligns with many left of center values – especially those on health care and human rights.

There is another perk for electing a non-CPC member to the house. How good would our map of Alberta look with a little colour on it? How good would a nice shiny buckle look on the southern Albertan belt.

The best chance of success to attain this is to vote NDP. They have done a great job of building a brand image in this city and providing a viable alternative. The fact remains most Albertans will not vote Liberal due to the bad taste left from the NEP and some insecurity issues lingering from being a “have not” province. The NDP stand a better chance on winning over progressive Canadian minds in this area.

The NDP have proven to be a strong opposition party and hell, they are not looking too bad in national polls right now. Their platform is not nearly as “socialist” as many may think, and the party’s primary values on balancing budgets while providing essential public services such as health care, child care, and a personal financial safety net is something many Canadian’s agree with regardless of partisan stripe. Further, both they and the LPC are proposing real action on climate change, and if southern Alberta should get behind anything, it should be that. Talk to any farmer, any one who depends on land and weather for their livelihood, and they can tell you how destructive weather shifts can be, and how an entire summer of rain can affect their crops.

Since 1997 Casson has held the seat for the Reform party, the Alliance and the Conservative party. He beat out every other candidate with at least 60% of the total vote share here.

Casson isn’t running this election and the current candidate, Jim Hillyer, is not a favourable one to many long time federal conservative supporters. His own party removing him from any public appearances speaks to the faith they have in this candidate. While I cannot speak to this with much insider knowledge, I have heard from long time CPC supporters that his nomination win wasn’t celebrated by very many.

The CPC has ignored southern Alberta. They take it for granted that the majority of people will vote CPC even if a bale of hay ran as their candidate. They constituency association has gone so far as to hide their candidate from any real debate, from any place where a group of citizens could question him on the CPC’s record. Is this a person we want representing Lethbridge and area? Is this the candidate we want to send to the hill? Is this someone we are comfortable paying hundreds of thousands of dollars for his salary? That is real money going to a candidate who not only doesn’t know how much his party is willing spend on defense, but had said some costs shouldn’t even bother to go to debate.

If you vote to give your two dollars to that party, then vote any way you want. If you can genuinely reason why the CPC deserve to form government again, despite their numerous transgressions, then vote for a candidate who has to be hidden from the public. BUT if you have a desire to really change things* vote NDP (Mark Sandilands). It is Lethbridge’s best chance for progressive representation.

(*If you are all for change, but cannot bring yourself to vote NDP for whatever reason – why not do what progressives have done for the past ten years: stay home. That way, it is not your fault, no matter what happens. That is how it works, right?)

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “Lethbridge, vote strategically.

  1. Jonny says:

    Great blog post, Jenn.

  2. Nazayh Zanidean says:

    I agree, the map would look a lot nicer with a bit of color on it. Vote NDP!

  3. Ashley says:

    agreed.
    but a little confused by ‘progressives have stayed home the past 10 years’.. a lot of progressive people have worked hard the past 10 years in this province.

  4. Albert Wiseman says:

    In Victorian days in the UK a group would nominate someone who did not have political savvy or information. This person would be supported by the establishment usually of the Tory Party. Since the constituency was “solid blue” he did not have to worry about campaigning or even making appearances since his election was guaranteed.
    In effect this was a massive misuse of the democratic process and disenfranchised the voters since , no opposition stood any chance against the establishment., and the person elected was a puppet of the powerful forces arraigned against him.
    If our conservative candidate wishes to represent us in Ottawa he must have basic knowledge of the issues and be prepared to debate them. In Ottawa business is not conducted personally on the doorsteps of Parliament
    but in the cut and thrust of debate.
    Local Conservatives are being taken for granted by their national organizational leaders , and local team. In effect we are forced to vote for a voiceless person hoping that they will learn how to behave when they get there. This is the same as a missionary being expected to learn the language of the nation of his choice, whilst flying in on an areoplane.
    Maybe it would be appropriate for a protest vote in Lethbridge for those of a conservative bent, and have them throw their weight behind someone like the Christian Heritage party simply as protest against the insensitivity of our Conservative group in the City. … Dont take us for granted you could be sorry on ballot day!!

  5. […] to vote for, though one intrepid blogger laid out her thoughts on strategic voting in Lethbridge here, and we think it’s a pretty darn good rundown of […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Advertisements
%d bloggers like this: